📘 Appendix C — Micro‑Resonance Scenarios (RTT Micro‑Core)

Scenarios are intentionally small:
one triad, one boundary, one transition.

🧩 Scenario 1 — Stable Micro‑Resonance#

A micro‑state oscillates between two energy levels while maintaining coherence across its boundary.

Conditions#

• bounded drift
• consistent timing
• no structural inversion

Outcome#

A stable micro‑resonance pattern emerges and persists.
github.com

🔄 Scenario 2 — Drift‑Induced Collapse#

A micro‑regime accumulates small timing deviations until drift exceeds the coherence threshold.

Conditions#

• unbounded drift
• timing slippage
• boundary mismatch

Outcome#

Resonance collapses; the micro‑regime returns to a lower‑energy attractor.
github.com

🔺 Scenario 3 — Triad Inversion#

A micro‑triad undergoes a structural inversion in which the boundary node becomes the active node.

Conditions#

• local paradox
• reversible inversion
• fractional‑ladder shift

Outcome#

A new micro‑resonance pattern forms with inverted roles.
github.com

⚡ Scenario 4 — Energy‑Constrained Resonance#

A micro‑regime operates under strict energy limits (e.g., ultra‑low‑power environments).

Conditions#

• minimal energy input
• high coherence
• reduced transition bandwidth

Outcome#

A compressed but stable resonance pattern emerges.
github.com

🌀 Scenario 5 — Fractional‑Ladder Transition#

A micro‑state transitions across fractional dimensions (e.g., 0.7 → 1.2).

Conditions#

• partial dimensional expansion
• coherent boundary shift
• stable transition timing

Outcome#

The micro‑regime enters a new fractional layer while preserving resonance and coherence.
github.com

✔️ Status#

These scenarios are canonical for Micro‑Core.
Domain‑specific examples appear in their respective modules.