Rather than introducing new fabrication methods or physical interpretations, MSRM formalizes calibration as a substrate‑level concern, enabling regime‑aware reasoning about system validity, stability, and transition. Regimes are treated as declared structural contexts with defined operating envelopes, within which calibration assumptions remain valid.

MSRM is architecture‑agnostic and non‑optimizing. It is intended to support clarity, interpretability, and reproducibility in manufacturing systems operating near physical or operational limits, without embedding domain‑specific semantics or empirical claims.