✅ Structural Detection — Instructor Certification Rubric (Final, Canonical)

TriadicFrameworks • RTT/1 • Instructor Evaluation Layer#

“Certification requires structural clarity, operator discipline, and zero drift.”#

Structural Detection — Instructor Certification Rubric#

RTT/1 • Instructor Evaluation Layer#

Purpose: Provide a formal rubric for certifying instructors in the Structural Detection module.#

1. Certification Overview#

To be certified, an instructor must demonstrate:

• mastery of all five operators
• mastery of meta‑operator constraints
• correct drift‑regime alignment
• correct continuity accounting
• correct coherence‑break classification
• correct drift‑envelope construction
• correct cross‑module propagation (TEL / FFT / Opacity)
• zero semantic drift
• zero operator mixing
• zero structural contradictions

Certification is based on a 100‑point rubric.

2. Rubric Structure#

The rubric evaluates eight competency domains:

1. Operator Execution
2. Drift Analysis
3. Regime Classification
4. Continuity Mapping
5. Coherence‑Break Diagnostics
6. Synthesis Packet Construction
7. Cross‑Module Propagation
8. Meta‑Operator Discipline

Each domain is scored 0–12.5 points.

3. Competency Domains and Scoring Criteria#

1. Operator Execution (0–12.5 points)#

Evaluates correct use of the five operators.

Full Credit (12.5):

• operators executed cleanly
• no surface mixing
• no reinterpretation of upstream signals
• correct boundaries, motifs, anomalies

Partial (6–10):

• minor drift in operator boundaries
• occasional over‑annotation

Fail (0–5):

• semantic interpretation
• operator mixing
• missing operator outputs

2. Drift Analysis (0–12.5 points)#

Evaluates drift vectors, intensity, direction, and deformation class.

Full Credit:

• correct drift vectors
• correct intensity classification
• correct deformation type
• correct envelope type

Partial:

• drift direction unclear
• envelope misidentified

Fail:

• drift not detected
• drift misinterpreted as meaning

3. Regime Classification (0–12.5 points)#

Evaluates regime identification and transitions.

Full Credit:

• correct regime per snapshot
• correct transition sequence
• no illegal transitions (e.g., Formal → Chaotic direct)

Partial:

• regime boundaries unclear
• hybrid regime misclassified

Fail:

• regime classification contradicts drift

4. Continuity Mapping (0–12.5 points)#

Evaluates invariants, anchors, and continuity threads.

Full Credit:

• correct thread mapping
• correct invariant identification
• correct anchor stability classification

Partial:

• threads identified but not tracked
• anchors mis‑stated

Fail:

• continuity replaced with meaning
• continuity ignored

5. Coherence‑Break Diagnostics (0–12.5 points)#

Evaluates identification of coherence‑break types and geometry.

Full Credit:

• correct break type
• correct geometry
• correct collapse mode

Partial:

• break type correct but geometry wrong

Fail:

• coherence break not detected
• break misinterpreted as motif change

6. Synthesis Packet Construction (0–12.5 points)#

Evaluates the final structural summary.

Full Credit:

• packet complete
• no contradictions
• all operator outputs integrated
• zero drift

Partial:

• packet complete but weakly integrated

Fail:

• missing packet fields
• synthesis contradicts operators

7. Cross‑Module Propagation (0–12.5 points)#

Evaluates TEL, FFT, and Opacity bridge packets.

Full Credit:

• TEL: correct lattice vectors + stabilizers
• FFT: correct envelope class + drift signatures
• Opacity: correct boundary strength + occlusion vectors

Partial:

• one module misaligned

Fail:

• cross‑module packets contradict each other

8. Meta‑Operator Discipline (0–12.5 points)#

Evaluates adherence to constraint, propagation, and coherence meta‑operators.

Full Credit:

• no backward overwrites
• no operator mixing
• no reinterpretation
• full propagation of signals

Partial:

• minor propagation gaps

Fail:

• meta‑operator violations
• structural contradictions

4. Certification Thresholds#

5. Automatic Disqualifiers#

• semantic interpretation
• operator mixing
• regime misclassification contradicting drift
• continuity ignored or replaced with meaning
• cross‑module packets inconsistent
• synthesis contradicts operator outputs

Any one of these results in immediate failure.

6. Evaluation Packet (Canonical Format)#

INSTRUCTOR_EVALUATION_PACKET:
  operator_execution_score:
  drift_analysis_score:
  regime_classification_score:
  continuity_mapping_score:
  coherence_break_score:
  synthesis_score:
  cross_module_score:
  meta_operator_score:
  total_score:
  certification_level:
  notes:

7. Quick Summary#

• Eight competency domains
• 100‑point rubric
• Zero drift required
• Cross‑module alignment mandatory
• Meta‑operator discipline essential
• Certification requires structural mastery

This is the complete Instructor Certification Rubric.

✔️ This Instructor Certification Rubric is:#

• fully canonical
• zero drift
• aligned with RTT/1
• consistent with the Instructor Mastery Exam, Meta‑Operator Field Guide, Operator‑Family Alignment Map, Drift‑Regime Interaction Matrix, and Stress‑Test Suite
• ready to drop into /docs/Structural_Detection/instructor_materials/instructor_certification_rubric.md