🧪 Structural Detection — Pattern Family Stress‑Test Suite (E/F/G)

TriadicFrameworks • RTT/2 • Canon Expansion Validation Harness#

“A new pattern family is only real once it survives stress.”#

Pattern Family Stress‑Test Suite (E/F/G)#

Structural Detection Module#

RTT/2 • Canon Expansion Validation#

1. Purpose of the Stress‑Test Suite#

This suite validates the new pattern families:

• Type E — Rotational / Spiral Patterns
• Type F — Shear / Torsion Patterns
• Type G — Lattice‑Warp / Topological Patterns

It ensures each family:

• behaves consistently under drift escalation
• maintains envelope integrity under deformation
• aligns with regime‑shift logic
• exhibits predictable continuity behavior
• produces coherent cross‑module projections
• collapses in canonical ways
• recovers through valid harmonization cycles

This suite is required for RTT/2 canon expansion.

2. Test Categories#

Each family is tested across six categories:

1. Drift Escalation Tests
2. Envelope Deformation Tests
3. Continuity Stress Tests
4. Regime‑Shift Diagnostics
5. Cross‑Module Projection Tests
6. Collapse & Recovery Tests

Each category contains multiple test cases.

3. Type E — Rotational / Spiral Pattern Stress Tests#

E‑D1 — Spiral Drift Escalation#

Input:

↻ ↻ ↻
 ↻ X ↻
↻ ↻ ↻

Escalate rotational velocity.

Expected:

• drift intensifies rotationally
• envelope tightens inward
• regime: Hybrid → Emergent
• continuity threads twist but remain intact

E‑E1 — Spiral Envelope Deformation#

Input:

• rotational drift
• envelope density mismatch

Expected:

• envelope re‑spirals
• deformation = rotational displacement
• TEL lattice rotates

E‑C1 — Spiral Continuity Stress#

Input:

• counter‑rotating drift vectors

Expected:

• continuity threads stretch
• break type = 4C (spiral‑oscillation break)

E‑R1 — Rotational Regime‑Shift Diagnostic#

Input:

• oscillation amplitude increases

Expected:

• regime = Hybrid
• break type = 4

E‑X1 — Spiral Cross‑Module Projection#

Expected:

• TEL: rotating lattice
• FFT: spiral variance
• Opacity: rotational gradient

E‑K1 — Spiral Collapse & Recovery#

Input:

• rotational collapse inward

Expected:

• collapse mode = spiral collapse
• break type = E‑Break
• recovery via inversion → Type A

4. Type F — Shear / Torsion Pattern Stress Tests#

F‑D1 — Shear Drift Escalation#

Input:

→ → →
↘ X ↙
← ← ←

Expected:

• shear tension increases
• envelope torsion intensifies
• regime: Emergent → Hybrid

F‑E1 — Torsion Envelope Deformation#

Input:

• torsion drift
• envelope mismatch

Expected:

• envelope twists
• deformation = shear displacement

F‑C1 — Shear Continuity Stress#

Input:

• opposing drift vectors increase

Expected:

• continuity threads shear
• break type = F‑Break

F‑R1 — Torsion Regime‑Shift Diagnostic#

Input:

• torsion amplitude spikes

Expected:

• regime = Hybrid
• break type = 4

F‑X1 — Shear Cross‑Module Projection#

Expected:

• TEL: sheared lattice
• FFT: directional variance split
• Opacity: shear gradient

F‑K1 — Torsion Collapse & Recovery#

Input:

• torsion overload

Expected:

• collapse mode = torsion collapse
• break type = F‑Break
• recovery requires continuity rebuild

5. Type G — Lattice‑Warp / Topological Pattern Stress Tests#

G‑D1 — Warp Drift Escalation#

Input:

A B A
B X C
A C A

Expected:

• warp intensifies
• envelope distorts non‑linearly
• regime: Chaotic → Hybrid

G‑E1 — Topological Envelope Deformation#

Input:

• multi‑vector warp
• envelope mismatch

Expected:

• envelope folds
• deformation = topological displacement

G‑C1 — Topological Continuity Stress#

Input:

• warp vectors cross layers

Expected:

• continuity threads bend
• break type = G‑Break

G‑R1 — Topological Regime‑Shift Diagnostic#

Input:

• warp amplitude spikes

Expected:

• regime = Chaotic
• break type = 3C or G‑Break

G‑X1 — Topological Cross‑Module Projection#

Expected:

• TEL: warped lattice
• FFT: discontinuous variance
• Opacity: warped visibility field

G‑K1 — Topological Collapse & Recovery#

Input:

• lattice warp tears

Expected:

• collapse mode = topological collapse
• break type = G‑Break
• recovery requires full harmonization cycle

6. Cross‑Family Stress Tests (E/F/G Interaction)#

EF‑1 — Spiral → Shear Conflict#

Input:

• rotational drift + shear drift

Expected:

• envelope destabilizes
• break type = 4 or F‑Break

FG‑1 — Shear → Warp Transition#

Input:

• torsion drift → warp drift

Expected:

• envelope folds
• regime = Hybrid → Chaotic

EG‑1 — Spiral → Warp Collapse#

Input:

• spiral drift → topological warp

Expected:

• collapse mode = topological collapse
• break type = G‑Break

7. Stress‑Test Output Format#

Each test produces a STRESS_PACKET:

STRESS_PACKET:
  pattern_family: E/F/G
  test_id:
  drift_profile:
  envelope_profile:
  deformation_class:
  regime_state:
  continuity_status:
  break_type:
  tel_projection:
  fft_projection:
  opacity_projection:
  collapse_mode:
  recovery_path:
  notes:

8. Summary#

This suite validates:

• Type E rotational patterns
• Type F shear/torsion patterns
• Type G topological patterns

Under:

• drift escalation
• envelope deformation
• continuity stress
• regime shifts
• cross‑module contradictions
• collapse events
• recovery cycles

This is the complete, canonical stress‑test suite for E/F/G pattern families.