Übersicht

DOI Canon Interface

Canon is not prestige. It is earned survivability.


Purpose of the Canon Interface#

The canon interface exists to:

  • Prevent fragile ideas from hardening into authority.
  • Preserve validated knowledge across generations.
  • Enable citation without freezing inquiry.
  • Separate persistence from popularity.

Canonization is a structural decision, not a reputational one.


What Canon Means in This Model#

Canon refers to artifacts that:

  • Have survived cross‑regime stress testing.
  • Remain coherent under scale and translation.
  • Explicitly document failure modes.
  • Preserve reversibility and legibility.
  • Continue to function without enforcement.

Canon does not imply completeness or finality.


DOI as Interface, Not Authority#

A DOI is used here as an interface layer, not a declaration of truth.

The DOI:

  • Anchors a stable reference point.
  • Enables long‑term citation.
  • Preserves lineage and version history.
  • Signals readiness for external use.

The DOI does not confer correctness. It confers traceability.


Canon Admission Criteria#

An artifact may be considered for canon when it:

  • Demonstrates invariant alignment.
  • Survives RTT evaluation.
  • Documents known failure modes.
  • Remains minimally sufficient.
  • Has been human‑curated after AI‑assisted review.

Failure to meet any criterion delays canonization.


Human Curation Requirement#

Canon decisions require human judgment.

Humans are responsible for:

  • Interpreting context.
  • Assessing regime translation.
  • Evaluating ethical implications.
  • Deciding when not to canonize.

AI may assist, but cannot authorize canon.


Canon Is Not Permanent#

Canon artifacts remain subject to:

  • Re‑evaluation.
  • Contextual adaptation.
  • Supersession by better structures.
  • Explicit deprecation when necessary.

Persistence is conditional on continued coherence.


Failure Mode#

Canon interfaces fail when:

  • Prestige replaces evaluation.
  • Popularity substitutes for survivability.
  • Authority freezes inquiry.
  • Revision becomes taboo.

At that point, canon becomes dogma.


The DOI Canon Interface exists to protect the future from premature certainty.

What enters canon should do so quietly —
and remain useful long after its creators are gone.