Overzicht

🔥 Structural Detection — Regime‑Shift Stress‑Test Suite (RTT/2)

TriadicFrameworks • RTT/2 • Regime Stability, Legality & Collapse‑Resistance Validation#

Regime‑Shift Stress‑Test Suite (RTT/2)#

Structural Detection Module#

RTT/2 • Regime Stability & Collapse‑Resistance Validation#


1. Purpose of the Stress‑Test Suite#

This suite validates whether a regime shift is:

  • structurally stable
  • envelope‑compatible
  • drift‑aligned
  • continuity‑supported
  • collapse‑resistant
  • cross‑module coherent
  • legally permissible under RTT/2 regime law

It is invoked for:

  • new regime logic
  • ambiguous regime transitions
  • hybrid regime states
  • inversion‑driven transitions
  • collapse‑adjacent transitions
  • cross‑module regime contradictions

2. Regime‑Shift Test Categories#

The suite contains six categories of regime‑stress tests:

  1. Drift‑Driven Regime‑Shift Tests
  2. Envelope‑Driven Regime‑Shift Tests
  3. Continuity‑Driven Regime‑Shift Tests
  4. Break‑Chain‑Driven Regime‑Shift Tests
  5. Cross‑Module Regime‑Shift Tests
  6. Collapse‑Mode Regime‑Shift Tests

Each category contains multiple adversarial test cases.


3. Drift‑Driven Regime‑Shift Tests#

These tests determine whether drift geometry can legally support the shift.

D‑RS1 — Linear → Emergent#

Expected:

  • legal
  • continuity stable
  • no collapse

D‑RS2 — Linear → Chaotic#

Expected:

  • illegal
  • collapse‑risk: Type 1 → Type 2

D‑RS3 — Oscillatory → Hybrid#

Expected:

  • legal
  • oscillation dampening required

D‑RS4 — Reversed Drift → Inversion#

Expected:

  • legal
  • continuity partial collapse

4. Envelope‑Driven Regime‑Shift Tests#

These tests validate envelope compatibility.

E‑RS1 — Spiral Envelope → Hybrid#

Expected:

  • legal
  • break‑risk: 4C

E‑RS2 — Fragmented Envelope → Chaotic#

Expected:

  • legal
  • collapse‑risk: Type 3

E‑RS3 — Topological Fold → Chaotic→Hybrid#

Expected:

  • conditional
  • harmonization required

5. Continuity‑Driven Regime‑Shift Tests#

These tests validate whether continuity layers can support the shift.

C‑RS1 — Weak Anchors → Formal→Emergent#

Expected:

  • illegal
  • anchor collapse

C‑RS2 — Thread Flexibility → Emergent→Chaotic#

Expected:

  • legal
  • fragmentation risk

C‑RS3 — Partial Invariant Collapse → Hybrid→Inversion#

Expected:

  • conditional
  • inversion stabilization required

6. Break‑Chain‑Driven Regime‑Shift Tests#

These tests validate regime shifts under active break‑chains.

B‑RS1 — Type 1 Break → Formal→Emergent#

Expected:

  • illegal
  • break propagation

B‑RS2 — Type 4 Break → Hybrid→Chaotic#

Expected:

  • collapse‑triggering

B‑RS3 — Type G Break → Chaotic→Hybrid#

Expected:

  • conditional
  • topological stabilization required

7. Cross‑Module Regime‑Shift Tests#

These tests validate regime shifts across TEL/FFT/Opacity.

X‑RS1 — TEL Lattice Instability → Emergent→Hybrid#

Expected:

  • conditional
  • lattice regeneration required

X‑RS2 — FFT Variance Spike → Hybrid→Inversion#

Expected:

  • illegal
  • inversion collapse risk

X‑RS3 — Opacity Boundary Rupture → Chaotic→Emergent#

Expected:

  • legal after harmonization

8. Collapse‑Mode Regime‑Shift Tests#

These tests validate regime shifts under collapse‑mode pressure.

K‑RS1 — Type A Collapse → Formal→Emergent#

Expected:

  • illegal
  • collapse intensifies

K‑RS2 — Type D Collapse → Hybrid→Inversion#

Expected:

  • conditional
  • oscillation dampening required

K‑RS3 — Type G Collapse → Chaotic→Hybrid#

Expected:

  • legal only after topological repair

9. Regime‑Shift Stress‑Test Output Format#

Each test produces a REGIME_STRESS_PACKET:

REGIME_STRESS_PACKET:
  from_regime:
  to_regime:
  drift_profile:
  envelope_profile:
  continuity_status:
  break_chain_status:
  module_projection_status:
  collapse_risk:
  legality_status:
  required_actions:
  final_state:
  notes:

10. Summary#

The Regime‑Shift Stress‑Test Suite validates:

  • drift‑driven regime shifts
  • envelope‑driven regime shifts
  • continuity‑driven regime shifts
  • break‑chain‑driven regime shifts
  • cross‑module regime shifts
  • collapse‑mode regime shifts

It ensures that all regime transitions are:

  • legal
  • stable
  • collapse‑resistant
  • cross‑module coherent
  • canon‑safe

This is the complete, canonical RTT/2 Regime‑Shift Stress‑Test Suite.

Updated