LINEAGE Cross‑Map — Forecast vs Actuals ↔ Social Security Proto‑Fund
Modules: Research Toolbox • Inverted Economics • Proto‑Fund Lineage
Entries: forecast_vs_actuals • social_security_protofund
1. Shared Structural Core#
Both lineage entries share:
- RTT/1: temporal actuals vs forecasts
- RTT/2: regime literacy (transitional vs collapsing)
- RTT/3: coherence reset (surface / structural / resonance)
- Substrate: S1–S4 with strong S2 (transfer‑system prior)
The proto‑fund lineage is a domain‑specific instance of the Forecast vs Actuals pattern.
2. Mapping Table#
| Forecast vs Actuals | Social Security Proto‑Fund |
|---|---|
| temporal divergence (actuals vs forecasts) | inflows/outflows vs long‑range collapse forecasts |
| regime clarification (RTT/2) | transitional regime, not collapsing |
| coherence reset (RTT/3) | surface collapse narrative vs structural behavior |
| TEL pattern echo | demographic & trust‑fund echo families |
| SARG argument echo | re‑framed claims about “fund collapse” |
3. Direction of Inheritance#
- Upstream pattern:
forecast_vs_actuals - Downstream specialization:
social_security_protofund
The proto‑fund entry:
- inherits the temporal divergence structure
- specializes the system type (public transfer system)
- adds Inverted Economics and GSM as required modules
4. Cross‑Module Effects#
-
Inverted Economics:
Uses Forecast vs Actuals to reclassify “fund collapse” as transfer‑system temporal mismatch. -
Proto‑Fund Lineage:
Uses Forecast vs Actuals to define proto‑fund as:behaves like a transfer system, described like a fund.
-
Media Substrate Model:
Explains why collapse narratives persist despite stable or transitional actuals.
5. Canonical Relationship#
In canon:
- Any proto‑fund analysis that involves long‑range projections must reference the Forecast vs Actuals lineage.
- Any Forecast vs Actuals teaching example that uses Social Security must reference the proto‑fund lineage.
This cross‑map is the canonical link between the two entries.