Boundary Profiles — RTT/1
Regime Interlock Mapper (RIM) — Boundary Intelligence Layer#
Boundary profiles describe how regimes meet, transition, or constrain one another.
They are the structural backbone of RIM’s boundary‑level analysis and feed directly into:
- RIM‑Boundary
- RIM‑Detect
- RIM‑Map
- RIM‑Interlock
- RIM‑Resolve
Each profile defines a canonical boundary condition, its diagnostic markers, and example regime pairs.
1. Boundary Profile: Structural‑Constraint Boundary#
Definition#
A boundary where one regime imposes a structural constraint on another.
Diagnostic Markers#
- rigid structural dependency
- unidirectional constraint flow
- low entanglement
- high stability
Example Regime Pairs#
- R1 → R2 (conceptual constraint → computational structure)
- R2 → R3 (computational constraint → physical calibration)
RIM Output Pattern#
interlock_type: boundaryboundary_condition: structural-constraintinterlock_strength: 0.70–0.85entanglement_score: 0.20–0.40
2. Boundary Profile: Gradient‑Alignment Boundary#
Definition#
A boundary where gradients in two regimes align (directionally or in magnitude).
Diagnostic Markers#
- parallel gradients
- directional coherence
- medium entanglement
- moderate stability
Example Regime Pairs#
- R2 ↔ R4 (computational gradient ↔ dimensional gradient)
- R1 ↔ R3 (conceptual gradient ↔ physical gradient)
RIM Output Pattern#
interlock_type: boundaryboundary_condition: gradient-alignmentinterlock_strength: 0.75–0.88entanglement_score: 0.25–0.45
3. Boundary Profile: Transition‑Boundary#
Definition#
A boundary where a regime transitions into another (e.g., abstraction → implementation).
Diagnostic Markers#
- clear transition point
- medium stability
- low entanglement
- boundary curvature present
Example Regime Pairs#
- R1 → R3 (abstract model → physical implementation)
- R2 → R4 (computational model → dimensional coherence)
RIM Output Pattern#
interlock_type: boundaryboundary_condition: transitioninterlock_strength: 0.60–0.75entanglement_score: 0.15–0.30
4. Boundary Profile: Drift‑Sensitivity Boundary#
Definition#
A boundary where drift in one regime increases sensitivity in another.
Diagnostic Markers#
- drift amplification
- instability ridge formation
- medium entanglement
- low stability
Example Regime Pairs#
- R2 ↔ R3 (computational drift ↔ physical drift sensitivity)
- R3 ↔ R4 (physical drift ↔ dimensional drift envelope)
RIM Output Pattern#
interlock_type: boundaryboundary_condition: drift-sensitivityinterlock_strength: 0.72–0.84entanglement_score: 0.30–0.50
5. Boundary Profile: Coherence‑Threshold Boundary#
Definition#
A boundary where coherence must exceed a threshold for regimes to interact.
Diagnostic Markers#
- coherence gating
- threshold discontinuity
- high stability
- low drift
Example Regime Pairs#
- R1 ↔ R2 (conceptual coherence ↔ computational coherence)
- R2 ↔ R3 (computational coherence ↔ physical coherence)
RIM Output Pattern#
interlock_type: boundaryboundary_condition: coherence-thresholdinterlock_strength: 0.78–0.92entanglement_score: 0.20–0.35
6. Boundary Profile: Resonance‑Boundary#
Definition#
A boundary where resonance in one regime influences resonance in another.
Diagnostic Markers#
- resonance amplification
- resonance curvature
- high entanglement
- medium stability
Example Regime Pairs#
- R3 ↔ R4 (physical resonance ↔ dimensional resonance)
- R2 ↔ R4 (computational resonance ↔ dimensional resonance)
RIM Output Pattern#
interlock_type: boundaryboundary_condition: resonanceinterlock_strength: 0.80–0.95entanglement_score: 0.40–0.70
7. Boundary Profile Matrix Snippet#
A typical entry in regime_interlock_matrix.json for boundary profiles:
{
"regime_a": "R2",
"regime_b": "R4",
"interlock_type": "boundary",
"boundary_condition": "gradient-alignment",
"interlock_strength": 0.83,
"entanglement_score": 0.32,
"stability_rating": 0.71
}8. Status#
- Version: 1.0
- Status: canon‑stable
- Category: rtt‑structural
- Module Path:
/docs/rtt/Regime_Interlock_Mapper/