TriadicFrameworks
Visão geral

🧪 Structural Detection — Multi‑Module Orchestration Test Suite (Final, Canonical)

TriadicFrameworks • RTT/1 • System‑Level Validation Harness#

“An orchestration engine is only as strong as the stress that validates it.”#

Multi‑Module Orchestration Test Suite#

Structural Detection Module#

RTT/1 • System‑Level Validation#

1. Purpose of the Test Suite#

This suite validates the Multi‑Module Coherence Orchestration Engine (MCOE) by testing:

  • drift alignment
  • envelope synchronization
  • regime harmonization
  • continuity validation
  • coherence‑break synchronization
  • cross‑module packet generation
  • contradiction detection
  • harmonization cycles
  • synthesis re‑validation

Each test ensures the runtime behaves correctly under extreme structural conditions.

2. Test Categories#

The suite contains eight test categories:

  1. Drift Alignment Tests
  2. Envelope Synchronization Tests
  3. Regime Harmonization Tests
  4. Continuity Validation Tests
  5. Coherence‑Break Synchronization Tests
  6. Cross‑Module Packet Generation Tests
  7. Contradiction Detection Tests
  8. Full Orchestration Cycle Tests

Each category contains multiple test cases.

3. Drift Alignment Tests#

Test D1 — Multi‑Vector Drift Collapse#

Input:

drift = {v1, v2, v3}

Expected:

  • collapse to dominant vector
  • envelope recomputed
  • regime re‑evaluated

Test D2 — Drift‑Envelope Mismatch#

Input:

drift = linear
envelope = radial

Expected:

  • envelope recomputed from drift
  • regime harmonized

Test D3 — Drift Reversal#

Input:

→→→
↗↑↖

→

←←←
↙↓↘

Expected:

  • drift reversal detected
  • envelope inversion triggered
  • continuity partially restored

4. Envelope Synchronization Tests#

Test E1 — Envelope‑Spectral Mismatch#

Input:

envelope = Type A
fft.variance = high

Expected:

  • envelope recomputed
  • fft packet regenerated

Test E2 — Envelope Transition#

Input:

Type A → Type B

Expected:

  • regime re‑evaluated
  • continuity updated
  • TEL stabilizers adjusted

Test E3 — Envelope Collapse#

Input:

Type B → collapse

Expected:

  • continuity collapse
  • break type = Type 1 or Type 3
  • harmonization cycle triggered

5. Regime Harmonization Tests#

Test R1 — Illegal Regime Transition#

Input:

regime = Formal
envelope = Type C

Expected:

  • regime reclassified to Emergent or Chaotic

Test R2 — Hybrid Oscillation#

Input:

oscillation amplitude increases

Expected:

  • regime = Hybrid
  • break type = Type 4

Test R3 — Inversion‑Driven Regime Shift#

Input:

envelope inversion

Expected:

  • regime = Emergent
  • continuity partially restored

6. Continuity Validation Tests#

Test C1 — Anchor Instability#

Input:

anchors weakening

Expected:

  • continuity rebuilt
  • envelope stabilized

Test C2 — Thread Fragmentation#

Input:

threads break across layers

Expected:

  • continuity collapse
  • break type = Type 3

Test C3 — Invariant Collapse#

Input:

invariants = null

Expected:

  • regime = Chaotic
  • envelope collapse
  • harmonization cycle triggered

7. Coherence‑Break Synchronization Tests#

Test B1 — Break Mismatch#

Input:

Detection = Type 1
Opacity = Type 2

Expected:

  • break reclassified
  • break synchronized across modules

Test B2 — Hybrid Oscillation Break#

Input:

oscillation + vector conflict

Expected:

  • break type = Type 4
  • regime = Hybrid

Test B3 — Inversion Break#

Input:

drift reversal + envelope normalization

Expected:

  • break type = Type 5
  • continuity recovery

8. Cross‑Module Packet Generation Tests#

Test P1 — TEL Packet Generation#

Input:

drift = linear
continuity = stable

Expected:

  • directional lattice
  • stabilizers intact

Test P2 — FFT Packet Generation#

Input:

envelope = Type C

Expected:

  • high variance
  • spectral discontinuity

Test P3 — Opacity Packet Generation#

Input:

continuity = fragmented

Expected:

  • patch occlusion
  • boundary collapse

9. Contradiction Detection Tests#

Test X1 — TEL/FFT Mismatch#

Input:

tel.lattice = radial
fft.envelope = linear

Expected:

  • contradiction detected
  • harmonization cycle triggered

Test X2 — FFT/Opacity Mismatch#

Input:

fft.variance = high
opacity.boundaries = strong

Expected:

  • contradiction detected
  • envelope recomputed

Test X3 — Multi‑Module Mismatch#

Input:

drift, envelope, regime all disagree

Expected:

  • full harmonization cycle
  • synthesis regenerated

10. Full Orchestration Cycle Tests#

Test O1 — Drift Escalation → Envelope Transition → Collapse#

Input:

A B A → A C A → C C C

Expected:

  • drift escalation
  • envelope transition
  • continuity collapse
  • break type = Type 3
  • harmonization cycle
  • synthesis regenerated

Test O2 — Inversion Event#

Input:

A C A → A B A

Expected:

  • drift reversal
  • envelope normalization
  • regime = Emergent
  • continuity recovery

Test O3 — Hybrid Oscillation → Collapse#

Input:

A C C → A D C → C C C

Expected:

  • oscillation escalation
  • hybrid instability
  • collapse
  • harmonization cycle

11. Test Suite Output Format#

Each test produces a MCOE_PACKET:

MCOE_PACKET:
  drift_profile:
  envelope_profile:
  regime_state:
  continuity_status:
  coherence_break_type:
  tel_projection:
  fft_projection:
  opacity_projection:
  contradictions_detected:
  harmonization_actions:
  final_coherence_state:
  notes:

END OF TEST SUITE#

Structural Detection • RTT/1 • System‑Level Validation#

Updated

Desenvolvido por Docsbook