Sample Interpretation Walkthrough (v2.0.0)
This walkthrough demonstrates how the vST Micro‑Agent processes an unknown
input stream using a vST Structural Query Envelope (vST‑SQL).
The goal is to illustrate the interpreter’s structural‑first approach:
no semantics, no domain assumptions, and no inference about meaning.
The micro‑agent operates solely on repeatable, traceable, and transfer‑addressable structural features.
1. Inputs#
Signal Input#
A numeric stream of arbitrary origin:
{
"signal_id": "walkthrough_signal_v1",
"stream": [0.14, 0.10, 0.12, 0.47, 0.50, 0.48, 0.13, 0.11, 0.12],
"metadata": {
"sampling_rate_hz": 1000,
"units": "arbitrary"
}
}Query Envelope#
A minimal vST‑SQL structural query:
{
"query": {
"select": ["pattern", "periodicity"],
"where": {
"min_repetition": 2,
"min_similarity": 0.85
}
},
"input_binding": {
"signal_source": "walkthrough_signal_v1",
"stream_key": "stream"
}
}2. Interpreter Pipeline#
Step 1 — Normalization#
The stream is normalized to a consistent internal representation.
No semantic meaning is applied.
Step 2 — Pattern Extraction#
The interpreter scans for repeating motifs using sliding‑window similarity.
A candidate pattern emerges:
[0.14, 0.10, 0.12]
It recurs with similarity values between 0.88–0.93, satisfying the
min_similarity constraint.
Step 3 — Periodicity Detection#
Autocorrelation reveals a stable periodicity of 3 samples.
Step 4 — Constraint Filtering#
The pattern appears twice, satisfying min_repetition = 2.
Step 5 — Structural Consolidation#
The interpreter merges overlapping detections and produces a canonical structural description.
3. Output Summary#
- Detected pattern:
[0.14, 0.10, 0.12] - Repetitions: 2
- Similarity range: 0.88–0.93
- Periodicity: 3 samples
- Notes:
- No semantic interpretation performed
- No assumptions about origin or meaning
- Structural invariants only
4. Purpose of This Walkthrough#
This example demonstrates:
- how vST‑SQL queries operate
- how the micro‑agent extracts structure from unknown signals
- how RTT principles guide the detection process
- how structural invariants can be identified without domain knowledge
It is intentionally minimal and substrate‑agnostic.